Driving While Intoxicated: Per Se is against NY Vehicle and Traffic Law 1192.2.

by ECL Writer
NY Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192.3: Driving While Intoxicated

In the vibrant state of New York, the hustle and bustle of city life is a way of living for millions. From the iconic streets of Manhattan to the serene landscapes upstate, New York offers a diverse and thriving environment. However, amid the excitement and opportunities, there exists a steadfast commitment to road safety, particularly when it comes to driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs.

New York’s Vehicle and Traffic Law Section 1192.2 stands as a stark reminder of the state’s unyielding stance against driving while intoxicated. Commonly referred to as “Per Se,” this legal provision holds significant consequences for those who choose to ignore it. As eastcoastlaws.com delve into the intricacies of New York’s DWI laws, we will explore what Per Se means, its implications for motorists, and the measures in place to combat the grave threat posed by impaired driving.

Driving While Intoxicated

In New York, it is illegal to operate a vehicle with a blood alcohol content (BAC) of at least 0.08, according to New York Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192.2. This offence is commonly referred to as “per se” driving while intoxicated. The term “per se” means that you can be charged and convicted of this offence solely based on your BAC level, regardless of whether you were driving erratically or recklessly at the time.

To summarize, in New York, if you are found to be driving with a BAC of 0.08 or higher, you can be prosecuted for driving while intoxicated, even if there is no evidence of erratic or reckless driving. This legal standard is in place to discourage impaired driving and enhance road safety.

Defences for Driving While Intoxicated

The defences you mentioned are indeed some common strategies that individuals facing a DWI (Driving While Impaired) per se charge might use to challenge the case against them. However, it’s essential to understand that the effectiveness of these defences can vary depending on the specific circumstances of the case, local laws, and other factors. Here’s a bit more detail on the defences you mentioned:

  • Challenging the Basis for the Stop: If you believe that the police officer did not have a valid reason (probable cause or reasonable suspicion) to pull you over in the first place, you may be able to challenge the entire case. If a court determines that the stop was unjustified, any evidence collected after the stop, including field sobriety tests and chemical test results, might be suppressed or deemed inadmissible in court.
  • Questioning the Accuracy of Chemical Tests: Breathalyzer and blood tests are commonly used to measure blood alcohol content (BAC) levels. These tests can be challenged on several grounds:
    • Calibration and maintenance: The devices used for chemical tests need to be properly maintained and calibrated to ensure accuracy. If the equipment is not maintained correctly, it could lead to inaccurate results.
    • Chain of custody: Proper procedures must be followed when handling and transporting blood samples to ensure they are not tampered with or contaminated.
    • Administration: If the test was not administered correctly by law enforcement or medical personnel, it could lead to inaccurate results.
  • Rising BAC Defense: It’s possible to argue that your BAC was below the legal limit at the time you were driving but rose above the limit by the time you were tested. This can happen if alcohol is still being absorbed into your bloodstream after you stop drinking.
  • Medical Conditions: Some medical conditions or medications can mimic the signs of impairment. If you have a medical condition that could have affected your performance on field sobriety tests or your BAC reading, it may be a valid defence.
  • Violation of Rights: If your constitutional rights were violated during the arrest or testing process, such as a violation of your right to remain silent or your right to legal representation, you may have a defence.
  • No Probable Cause for Arrest: Even if the initial traffic stop was valid, if the officer did not have probable cause to arrest you for DWI, it could weaken the prosecution’s case.

It’s essential to consult with an attorney who specializes in DWI cases to determine the most appropriate defence strategy based on your specific circumstances. The effectiveness of any defence will depend on the evidence available, local laws, and the skill of your legal representation.

Sentence for Driving While Intoxicated

In the United States, DWI laws and penalties are generally regulated at the state level, so they can vary significantly between states. Penalties for DWI often depend on various factors, including the offender’s prior convictions, blood alcohol concentration (BAC), and the circumstances of the incident.

Typically, penalties for DWI can include fines, license suspension, mandatory alcohol education or treatment programs, probation, community service, and even imprisonment. The severity of the penalties tends to increase with each subsequent offence and may be influenced by factors such as the level of impairment, the presence of minors in the vehicle, and any injuries or fatalities resulting from the incident.

It’s crucial for individuals to be aware of and adhere to the DWI laws specific to their jurisdiction and to never drive under the influence of alcohol or drugs. Legal consequences aside, driving while intoxicated poses a significant risk to the safety of the driver, passengers, and others on the road. If you or someone you know is facing a DWI charge, it’s advisable to consult with an attorney who is knowledgeable about the laws in your jurisdiction to understand the specific consequences and potential defences.

New York Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192.2: Driving while intoxicated; per see

New York Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1192.2, often referred to as the “per se” provision, prohibits individuals from operating a motor vehicle when their blood alcohol concentration (BAC) is 0.08% or higher. This law sets a specific BAC threshold, and if a person’s BAC is at or above 0.08% as determined by a chemical analysis of their blood, breath, urine, or saliva conducted in accordance with the procedures outlined in section 1194 of the same article, they are considered to be driving while intoxicated.

In essence, this law makes it illegal to operate a motor vehicle with a BAC at or above 0.08% regardless of whether the individual’s ability to drive is impaired by alcohol. It establishes a “per se” standard, meaning that being at or above the specified BAC level is sufficient to charge a person with driving while intoxicated without the need to prove impairment through other evidence like erratic driving behaviour.

It’s important to note that DUI (driving under the influence) laws can vary by state, and the legal BAC limit, as well as other related regulations, may differ. Additionally, penalties for violating these laws can also vary based on factors such as prior offences and the specific circumstances of the incident. If you or someone you know is facing charges related to driving while intoxicated, it’s essential to consult with an attorney who is knowledgeable about the laws in your jurisdiction to understand the specific legal implications and potential consequences.

Leave a Comment

This blog is ONLY for informational or educational purposes and DOES NOT substitute professional legal advise. We take no responsibility or credit for what you do with this info.