Offensive Exhibition: NY Penal Law § 245.05

by ECL Writer
Impairing The Integrity Of A Pari-Mutuel Betting System In The Second Degree

In a world where freedom of expression is a cherished right, the boundaries of what constitutes offensive behavior can often be a contentious and complex issue. New York, like many states, has statutes in place to maintain public order and protect the sensibilities of its citizens. One such statute, NY Penal Law § 245.05, addresses offensive exhibition in a manner that seeks to balance the fundamental right to free expression with the need to prevent conduct that goes beyond the acceptable norms of society.

NY Penal Law § 245.05 is a legal provision that has generated significant debate, discussion, and, in some cases, legal action. This statute raises crucial questions about the scope of protected speech, the role of government in regulating offensive behavior, and the delicate balance between individual liberties and societal norms. In this article, will delve into the details of NY Penal Law § 245.05, exploring its purpose, key elements, and the broader implications it has on freedom of expression within the state of New York.

Offensive Exhibition: Understanding The Law

While there are some restrictions, New York is generally accommodating in terms of the forms of entertainment that individuals can offer. Such entertainment or performances may be prohibited if they include extreme subjecting of a person to indignities or the potential for physical harm to a person.

Under New York Penal Law § 245.05 you could be charged with offensive exhibition if you operate, produce, or furnish a place for an exhibition that:

  1. Involves participants performing an activity that involves physical exertion continuously for more than 8 hours without a break; or
  2. Involves a person being held up to ridicule or contempt by voluntarily submitting to indignities; or
  3. Involves the discharge of a firearm or the throwing of a knife, arrow, or dangerous instrument at a person.


Mandy, a local artist known for her provocative and controversial artwork, recently decided to display a new piece at her gallery. This artwork features graphic and explicit content, including explicit sexual imagery and violent scenes. Mandy is well aware that her new exhibit may elicit strong reactions from the public due to its explicit nature.

If Mandy goes ahead with displaying this controversial artwork at her gallery, she could potentially face prosecution for offensive exhibition under New York Penal Law § 245.05. This law aims to prevent actions that knowingly cause offensive physical conduct or exhibitions in public places, and Mandy’s artwork may be considered an offensive exhibition if it reasonably leads to anger, alarm, or annoyance among viewers in a public setting.



Offensive Exhibition Sentence

A violation is an offensive exhibition. If found guilty, the maximum term is 15 days in jail and a $250 fine. A conviction for a violation, however, won’t leave a criminal record.


If the participants are given breaks within the 8-hour period, even if the continuous period is less than 8 hours, you are not in violation of New York Penal Law 245.05(1), which prohibits offensive exhibition.

New York Penal Law § 245.05: Offensive Exhibition

An individual commits the offense of offensive exhibition when they knowingly engage in the following activities related to public entertainment or amusement:

  • Continuous participation in a competitive event, such as a dance contest, bicycle race, or any endurance-based contest, without breaks for a period exceeding eight consecutive hours.
  • Allowing oneself to be subjected to indignities, including having objects such as balls thrown at their head or body, leading to their public humiliation or contempt.
  • Discharging a firearm or projecting a knife, arrow, or any other sharp or hazardous object toward another individual.

Implications And Controversies

  • Freedom of Expression vs. Public Order: One of the key debates surrounding NY Penal Law § 245.05 revolves around the balance between freedom of expression and maintaining public order. While the First Amendment protects the right to free speech and expression, the law seeks to prevent actions that could disrupt public spaces and offend others. Striking a balance between these two principles is challenging.
  • Subjectivity: The law’s reliance on terms like “offensive” and “annoyance” makes it inherently subjective. What one person finds offensive, another might not. This subjectivity can lead to situations where enforcement of the law is uneven or perceived as arbitrary.
  • Chilling Effect: Critics argue that laws like NY Penal Law § 245.05 can have a chilling effect on free expression. People may self-censor to avoid potential legal consequences, stifling the marketplace of ideas and inhibiting creative expression.
  • Enforcement Disparities: There is concern that enforcement of this law may disproportionately affect certain groups or individuals based on their race, gender, or other characteristics. Such disparities can raise questions about the law’s fairness and potential for abuse.
  • Modern Challenges: In the age of social media and online platforms, determining what constitutes an offensive exhibition in a public space becomes even more complex. Online interactions and content can quickly reach a wide audience, leading to challenges in applying traditional laws to new mediums.

Hiring A New York Lawyer For Offensive Exhibition Case

Hiring a New York lawyer for an offensive exhibition case is essential for navigating the complex legal landscape. These cases often involve delicate balances between individual freedoms and public order. An experienced attorney can provide expert guidance, assessing the case’s merits, and crafting a strong defense strategy. They understand New York Penal Law § 245.05 intricacies, ensuring the best possible outcome. From protecting your rights to negotiating potential consequences, a skilled lawyer can be your advocate throughout the legal process, helping you achieve a fair resolution while safeguarding your interests and freedoms.

Leave a Comment

This blog is ONLY for informational or educational purposes and DOES NOT substitute professional legal advise. We take no responsibility or credit for what you do with this info.